“Automation in aviation” is one of the most common question topic that Aerocadet pilot career development consultants get from the young prospective flight training applicants: whether or not the airline industry is going to be able to sustain airline pilot jobs for the next ten or twenty years? The discussion of this question seriously bothers and dramatically affects young aviation enthusiasts career choices, and uninformed decisions may completely derail their potentially bright pilot careers in the future.
What scares them, is that many white-collar jobs, especially in fields like news reporting, creative writing, teaching and tutoring, software engineering, financial advising, and content creation, are at risk of displacement due to AI’s ability to compose articles, conduct lessons, process data, make decisions, and generate sophisticated outputs. So, would this techno-craze affect the pilot jobs in the nearest, 10-20 year future? Let’s talk about that.
Pilots, Sleep Tight: Government Bureaucracy is on Your Side.
One of the biggest reasons AI will struggle to replace licensed professionals is regulatory inertia. Licensed professions, including law, medicine, and aviation, are governed by government agencies and strict legal frameworks. Unlike software engineering, where AI tools like GitHub Copilot can be immediately adopted with no legal repercussions, implementing AI in licensed professions requires legislative changes, industry adaptation, and public acceptance.
In aviation, pilot certification is controlled by organizations like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the U.S., the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). These agencies have strict licensing and operational standards, which would need to be completely overhauled before AI pilots could legally replace human pilots. The complexity of rewriting these laws, conducting safety trials, and passing legislation would take decades.
Lets be honest here: the government employees in the FAA or EASA and DGCA and other aviation authorities are never driven by salary increases, bonuses or commission payments to advance the technology and increase personal accountability in the aviation industry: they get paid the same salary anyways. It is not in their interests to put their livelihood on the line and become responsible for approving utilization of advanced technologies, like AI, in the aviation sector – a move that could very easily backfire and result in massive legal liabilities and even criminal prosecutions against them, in case of a serious accident. Which brings us to the next point.
Creative Ability? It’s a Legal Liability.
Another major hurdle is liability and legal accountability. In professions like law, medicine, and aviation, mistakes have severe consequences. If an AI-controlled aircraft crashes, who is responsible? The airline? The AI developer? The manufacturer? The FAA, for approving technology for utilization in passenger aviation? It’s way too complicated, and no-one wants to be a liability Guinea pig, especially not the aviation authority bureaucrats. Legal systems, worldwide, are not equipped to handle liability in cases of fully autonomous aviation failures, making regulators hesitant to allow AI to take over critical decision-making roles. Even in medicine, where AI has shown promise in diagnosing diseases, governments still require human doctors to oversee and validate AI-driven medical decisions. Aviation authorities, which are responsible for the safety of hundreds of passengers per flight, are even less likely to allow AI-only operations anytime soon.
Public Trust: a Trusty Speed Bump on the Road to Automation.
Modern aircraft are already highly automated. Systems like autopilot, auto-throttle, and flight management computers handle most of a flight’s routine operations. However, human pilots remain in the cockpit to manage irregular situations, make real-time decisions, and handle emergencies.
So, even if AI technology were ready to replace pilots, public trust remains a major obstacle. A 2023 survey conducted by IATA found that over 75% of passengers would not feel comfortable flying on a fully autonomous aircraft. The aviation industry is heavily dependent on consumer confidence, and airlines would struggle to market AI-only flights. When their lives are on the line, psychologically, passengers find comfort in knowing a trained, experienced human is in control: a person who has the ability for creative problem solving, can think outside of the box, and dig into his immense treasure trove of experience and knowledge to save lives. Additionally, the research has shown that most people are more willing to trust a human error than an AI malfunction, especially in life-or-death situations. Until this changes, Airlines and regulatory bodies are unlikely to push for full automation until AI is trusted at the same level as human pilots, which could take decades.
Pilot Unions – to the Rescue!
Pilot unions are one of the strongest and most militant labor forces in the transportation industry. Organizations like ALPA (Air Line Pilots Association), IFALPA (International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations), and BALPA (British Airline Pilots’ Association) aggressively lobby against any policy that threatens pilot jobs. These unions have successfully prevented changes that could reduce pilot employment, such as the proposed reduction of two-pilot cockpits to single-pilot operations. Even if airlines wanted to introduce AI-driven planes, strong union opposition and political lobbying would delay or prevent such transitions for years, if not decades.
And while licensed professionals like pilots are protected, unregulated jobs—such as software engineers, financial advisors, and content creators—are already being disrupted by AI. For example, AI coding tools like GitHub Copilot and GPT-4 can now write complex code, debug software, and optimize algorithms, significantly reducing the need for entry-level programmers. Robo-advisors like Betterment and Wealthfront already handle investment strategies, replacing many human financial planners. AI-generated articles, AI video editing, and synthetic media production are threatening traditional content creation jobs. These jobs lack the government oversight and legal protections that shield airline pilots, doctors, and lawyers, making them more vulnerable to AI-driven automation.
AI as a Humble Assistant, Not a Pilot Replacement
AI will undoubtedly transform aviation, but rather than replacing pilots, it will enhance their decision-making capabilities. AI-driven flight planning, loan-planning, dispatch, and navigation, as well as advanced automation will reduce pilot workload, improve safety, and optimize operations. But a fully autonomous airline industry remains unrealistic due to regulatory and bureaucratic hurdles, liability and legal concerns, irreplaceable human element in emergencies, public trust issues and strong pilot union resistance.
In contrast, professions without government licensing protections are already seeing significant AI-driven disruption, with software engineering, financial advising, and journalism among the most affected fields. While AI will continue to play an increasingly important role in aviation, the job of an airline pilot is one of the most protected from automation—at least for the next several decades.
Questions? Comments? Send Aerocadet consultants an email or schedule a free consultation call!